Here’s an example of the Nouns Atm pumping out cash to a project for 5 months worth of operational costs which is a SUBSTANTIAL amount for ANY project to receive in the ecosystem. You can break this down to 99.12 eth per month = 495.98 eth @ $1 116,99.
Transparency is key as to how much each team member has received and how much has been spent on giveaways etc.
Why is transparency needed: when a majority of new projects are scrutinised for asking for too much money to execute their project, double standards cannot be at play in the ecosystem. This is only fair to the community. More can be read below.
Link: The-Noun-Square-at-Noun-O-Clock-Post-Pilot-Extension
Maty (Accounts) = 5.5 ETH/month for 7 months = 38.5 ETH = $42780,05 @ $1 111,17 per month.
I would debate that providing transparency for the The Noun Square spend should be headed up by Maty with the ask that he is requesting to manage the Nouns financial information.
To put things into context a chartered accountant earns $102,659 to $130,100 per annum. This amounts to 91,80 eth per year, 7.6 per month.
Qualifying as a Chartered Accountant (SA) usually takes 7 years (3-year degree; 1-year honours and 3-years internship) provided you are able to complete the undergraduate qualification; postgraduate qualification and board exams in the minimum time.
Are core team members being overpaid or underpaid for their time spent on building the Nouns brands and is it unfair when new projects request over 100 to 150 eth and are shut down?
We’re heading into 2023 and the brand is no longer in its teething phase. Transparency is key.
*Once again, it does not matter to me who gets paid what, but new comers need to be treated fairly. My calculations are up for debate.